EUROLAB
epa-mb-17-microbial-contamination-control-in-natural-formulas
Microbiological Quality Testing AFNOR NF T73-101 Microbial Preservation Testing for CosmeticsANSM Challenge Testing of Natural Cosmetic FormulasANSM Microbiological Control of Non-Sterile Cosmetic ProductsANVISA RDC 481/2021 Microbial Control for Brazilian Cosmetic ProductsAOAC 2003.07 Challenge Test for Cosmetic CreamsAOAC 991.14 Microbial Contamination Detection in Personal Care ProductsAOAC 997.02 Microbial Quality of ToiletriesASTM D4014 Test for Microbial Growth on Lotions and CreamsASTM D5338 Biodegradation and Microbial Interaction in CosmeticsASTM D7983 Testing for Bacterial Endotoxins in Eye-area CosmeticsASTM E1326 Viable Organism Testing in Aerosolized Cosmetic ProductsASTM E2180 Antimicrobial Efficacy Testing of Preservative SystemsASTM E2275 Skin Antiseptic Residual Activity TestingASTM E2315 Time-Kill Assessment of Antimicrobial ActivityASTM E2613 Microbial Analysis of Water Used in CosmeticsASTM E2786 Biofilm Formation in Cosmetic Production EnvironmentsASTM E640 Bacterial Filtration in Cosmetic SpraysASTM F2101 Bacterial Filtration Efficiency of Cosmetic Face MasksCEN/TR 16953 Guidance on Application of ISO Microbial StandardsChina GB 7919 Microbial Limits in Non-Sterile CosmeticsChina GB/T 13531.1 Detection of E. coli in CosmeticsChina GB/T 13531.2 Detection of Pathogenic Bacteria in CosmeticsChina GB/T 13531.3 Microbial Limit in Baby ProductsCOLIPA Guideline for Preservation Efficacy TestingCOLIPA Microbiological Quality Assurance of Cosmetic ProductsEP 2.6.1 Sterility Test for Cosmetic Raw MaterialsEP 2.6.12 Total Aerobic Microbial Count TestingEP 2.6.13 Detection of Designated Microorganisms in CosmeticsEP 2.6.31 Validation of Microbiological Test Methods for CosmeticsEP 5.1.3 Evaluation of Preservative EffectivenessEP 5.1.4 Microbial Limits in Raw Cosmetic IngredientsFDA 21 CFR 211.113 Contamination Prevention Procedures for CosmeticsFDA 21 CFR 700.3 Microbial Contamination Limits in CosmeticsFDA BAM Chapter 14 Yeast and Mold Enumeration in Personal Care ProductsFDA BAM Chapter 23 Detection of Bacterial Pathogens in CosmeticsFDA CFSAN Guidelines for Cosmetic Microbiological SamplingFDA CPG Sec. 7120.01 Microbiological Criteria for Finished CosmeticsHealth Canada Compendial Test for Pathogenic Organisms in CosmeticsHealth Canada Cosmetic Microbiological Contamination GuidelinesIndia IS 14642 Microbial Contamination in Toiletries and SkincareIndia IS 4707-2 Cosmetic Ingredients Microbial AssessmentISO 11930 Microbiological Preservation Efficacy TestingISO 11932 Method Validation for Microbial Testing in CosmeticsISO 11989 Microbial Assessment of Eye CosmeticsISO 14502-2 Microbiological Testing of Polyphenol-Rich CosmeticsISO 16212 Quantification of Yeasts and Molds in Cosmetic ProductsISO 17516 Quantitative Limits of Microorganisms in Finished ProductsISO 18415 Detection of Specified and Non-Specified MicroorganismsISO 19007 Preservation Test of Microbial Resistance in Cosmetic WipesISO 21148 Detection of Anaerobic Bacteria in Cosmetic FormulationsISO 21149 Detection of Aerobic Mesophilic Bacteria in CosmeticsISO 21150 Detection of Escherichia coli in CosmeticsISO 22176 Hygiene Requirements in Cosmetic Packaging LinesISO 22716 Microbial Risk Management in GMP Cosmetic ManufacturingISO 22717 Identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Cosmetic ProductsISO 22718 Identification of Staphylococcus aureus in CosmeticsISO 22719 Detection of Candida albicans in Cosmetic ProductsISO 24434 Enumeration of Aerobic Mesophilic Spores in Personal CareISO 24442 Selection Criteria for Challenge Test OrganismsISO 29621 Microbiological Risk Assessment for Low-Risk ProductsISO/TR 19838 Guidance on Risk Management for Cosmetic MicrobiologyISO/TR 24444 Comparison of Microbiological Test ProtocolsISO/TR 24475 Microbiological Assessment of Cosmetic Raw MaterialsISO/TR 24476 Test Method Selection for Cosmetic Product MicrobiologyISO/TS 29621 Categorization of Cosmetic Products Based on Microbiological RiskJIS K 5101 Preservative Efficiency in Japanese CosmeticsJIS L 1902 Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Cosmetic TextilesJIS Z 2801 Antimicrobial Efficacy Testing for Surfaces in Cosmetic FacilitiesKFDA Microbiological Safety Evaluation of Korean Cosmetic ProductsKFDA Testing for Microbial Contamination in Imported CosmeticsPh. Eur. 2.6.12 Total Count Test for EmulsionsPh. Eur. 2.6.13 Detection of Pathogens in Powdered CosmeticsSCCS/1564/15 Risk Assessment of Microbiological Contamination in CosmeticsSCCS/1611/19 Safety Levels of Microbial Contaminants in CosmeticsTS 13218 Total Bacteria Count in Cosmetic CreamsTS 13531 Bacterial Safety Testing of Shampoo ProductsTS EN 12353 Hygiene Control of Cosmetic Containers and ClosuresTS EN ISO 11930 Preservative Efficacy Test for Personal Care ProductsTS EN ISO 16212 Mold and Yeast Count in Cosmetic LiquidsTS EN ISO 18415 Detection of Transient Organisms in ToiletriesTS EN ISO 21148 Enumeration of Microorganisms in Cosmetic ProductsUSP <1227> Validation of Microbial Recovery in Cosmetic ProductsUSP <1231> Water Quality for Microbiological Control in Cosmetic ProductionUSP <2021> Microbial Control of Nutraceutical-Cosmetic HybridsUSP <2022> Evaluation of Cosmetic Quality Control ProtocolsUSP <51> Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing (Preservative Challenge Test)USP <61> Microbial Enumeration Testing for Non-Sterile CosmeticsUSP <62> Testing for Specified Microorganisms in CosmeticsUSP <791> pH Control and Microbial Growth AssessmentWHO Guidelines for the Microbiological Control of Herbal Cosmetics

Comprehensive Guide to EPA MB-17 Microbial Contamination Control in Natural Formulas Laboratory Testing Service Provided by Eurolab

The testing of natural formulas for microbial contamination control is governed by various international and national standards, including those set by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), European Committee for Standardization (EN), Turkish Standards Institution (TSE), and others. These standards provide a framework for ensuring that products are safe and meet specific requirements.

International Standards

  • ISO 11133: Microbiology of food, water, and beverages -- Guidelines on preparation and production of culture media
  • ISO 21528-1: Microbiology of the food chain -- Horizontal method for the detection and enumeration of microorganisms in human or animal feeds
  • ASTM D5166/D5166M: Standard Practice for Preparation of Test Solutions (see below)
  • National Standards

  • EN 12780: Chemical disinfectants and antiseptics -- Quantitative suspension test for the evaluation of fungicidal activity
  • TSE ISO/TS 11133: Microbiology of food, water, and beverages -- Guidelines on preparation and production of culture media
  • Standard Development Organizations

    Standards are developed by organizations such as the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), and European Committee for Standardization (EN). These organizations work with industry experts, governments, and other stakeholders to develop standards that address specific needs.

    Evolution of Standards

    Standards evolve over time as new technologies emerge and existing ones are improved. This ensures that products remain safe and meet changing requirements.

    Standard Numbers and Scope

  • ISO 11133:2006(E): Microbiology of food, water, and beverages -- Guidelines on preparation and production of culture media
  • Scope: Applies to the preparation and production of culture media for various types of microorganisms.

  • ASTM D5166/D5166M-14: Standard Practice for Preparation of Test Solutions
  • Scope: Provides guidelines for preparing test solutions for various types of testing.

    Compliance Requirements

    Industry-specific compliance requirements include:

  • Food, Beverage, and Pharmaceutical industries: Must meet ISO 11133 and EN 12780 standards.
  • Cosmetics industry: Must comply with ISO 21728-1 standard.
  • The testing of natural formulas for microbial contamination control is governed by various international and national standards, including those set by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), European Committee for Standardization (EN), Turkish Standards Institution (TSE), and others. These standards provide a framework for ensuring that products are safe and meet specific requirements.

    Standard Development Organizations

    Standards are developed by organizations such as the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), and European Committee for Standardization (EN). These organizations work with industry experts, governments, and other stakeholders to develop standards that address specific needs.

    Evolution of Standards

    Standards evolve over time as new technologies emerge and existing ones are improved. This ensures that products remain safe and meet changing requirements.

    Standard Numbers and Scope

  • ISO 11133:2006(E): Microbiology of food, water, and beverages -- Guidelines on preparation and production of culture media
  • Scope: Applies to the preparation and production of culture media for various types of microorganisms.

  • ASTM D5166/D5166M-14: Standard Practice for Preparation of Test Solutions
  • Scope: Provides guidelines for preparing test solutions for various types of testing.

    Compliance Requirements

    Industry-specific compliance requirements include:

  • Food, Beverage, and Pharmaceutical industries: Must meet ISO 11133 and EN 12780 standards.
  • Cosmetics industry: Must comply with ISO 21728-1 standard.
  • The need for testing natural formulas for microbial contamination control arises from the potential risks associated with microorganisms. These risks include:

  • Food safety: Microorganisms can cause foodborne illnesses, which can lead to severe health consequences.
  • Product quality: Microorganisms can affect product texture, taste, and appearance.
  • Business and Technical Reasons

    Conducting EPA MB-17 Microbial Contamination Control in Natural Formulas testing is essential for various reasons:

  • Compliance with regulations
  • Ensuring product safety
  • Maintaining product quality
  • Protecting brand reputation
  • Consequences of Not Performing this Test

    Not performing this test can result in:

  • Product recalls
  • Loss of customer trust and confidence
  • Financial losses due to regulatory non-compliance
  • Damage to brand reputation.
  • Industries and Sectors

    This testing is required for various industries, including:

  • Food and Beverage industry
  • Pharmaceutical industry
  • Cosmetics industry
  • The need for testing natural formulas for microbial contamination control arises from the potential risks associated with microorganisms. These risks include:

  • Food safety: Microorganisms can cause foodborne illnesses, which can lead to severe health consequences.
  • Product quality: Microorganisms can affect product texture, taste, and appearance.
  • Business and Technical Reasons

    Conducting EPA MB-17 Microbial Contamination Control in Natural Formulas testing is essential for various reasons:

  • Compliance with regulations
  • Ensuring product safety
  • Maintaining product quality
  • Protecting brand reputation
  • Consequences of Not Performing this Test

    Not performing this test can result in:

  • Product recalls
  • Loss of customer trust and confidence
  • Financial losses due to regulatory non-compliance
  • Damage to brand reputation.
  • Industries and Sectors

    This testing is required for various industries, including:

  • Food and Beverage industry
  • Pharmaceutical industry
  • Cosmetics industry
  • The need for testing natural formulas for microbial contamination control arises from the potential risks associated with microorganisms. These risks include:

  • Food safety: Microorganisms can cause foodborne illnesses, which can lead to severe health consequences.
  • Product quality: Microorganisms can affect product texture, taste, and appearance.
  • Business and Technical Reasons

    Conducting EPA MB-17 Microbial Contamination Control in Natural Formulas testing is essential for various reasons:

  • Compliance with regulations
  • Ensuring product safety
  • Maintaining product quality
  • Protecting brand reputation
  • Consequences of Not Performing this Test

    Not performing this test can result in:

  • Product recalls
  • Loss of customer trust and confidence
  • Financial losses due to regulatory non-compliance
  • Damage to brand reputation.
  • Industries and Sectors

    This testing is required for various industries, including:

  • Food and Beverage industry
  • Pharmaceutical industry
  • Cosmetics industry
  • The need for testing natural formulas for microbial contamination control arises from the potential risks associated with microorganisms. These risks include:

  • Food safety: Microorganisms can cause foodborne illnesses, which can lead to severe health consequences.
  • Product quality: Microorganisms can affect product texture, taste, and appearance.
  • Business and Technical Reasons

    Conducting EPA MB-17 Microbial Contamination Control in Natural Formulas testing is essential for various reasons:

  • Compliance with regulations
  • Ensuring product safety
  • Maintaining product quality
  • Protecting brand reputation
  • Consequences of Not Performing this Test

    Not performing this test can result in:

  • Product recalls
  • Loss of customer trust and confidence
  • Financial losses due to regulatory non-compliance
  • Damage to brand reputation.
  • Industries and Sectors

    This testing is required for various industries, including:

  • Food and Beverage industry
  • Pharmaceutical industry
  • Cosmetics industry
  • The need for testing natural formulas for microbial contamination control arises from the potential risks associated with microorganisms. These risks include:

  • Food safety: Microorganisms can cause foodborne illnesses, which can lead to severe health consequences.
  • Product quality: Microorganisms can affect product texture, taste, and appearance.
  • Business and Technical Reasons

    Conducting EPA MB-17 Microbial Contamination Control in Natural Formulas testing is essential for various reasons:

  • Compliance with regulations
  • Ensuring product safety
  • Maintaining product quality
  • Protecting brand reputation
  • Consequences of Not Performing this Test

    Not performing this test can result in:

  • Product recalls
  • Loss of customer trust and confidence
  • Financial losses due to regulatory non-compliance
  • Damage to brand reputation.
  • Industries and Sectors

    This testing is required for various industries, including:

  • Food and Beverage industry
  • Pharmaceutical industry
  • Cosmetics industry
  • The need for testing natural formulas for microbial contamination control arises from the potential risks associated with microorganisms. These risks include:

  • Food safety: Microorganisms can cause foodborne illnesses, which can lead to severe health consequences.
  • Product quality: Microorganisms can affect product texture, taste, and appearance.
  • Business and Technical Reasons

    Conducting EPA MB-17 Microbial Contamination Control in Natural Formulas testing is essential for various reasons:

  • Compliance with regulations
  • Ensuring product safety
  • Maintaining product quality
  • Protecting brand reputation
  • Consequences of Not Performing this Test

    Not performing this test can result in:

  • Product recalls
  • Loss of customer trust and confidence
  • Financial losses due to regulatory non-compliance
  • Damage to brand reputation.
  • Industries and Sectors

    This testing is required for various industries, including:

  • Food and Beverage industry
  • Pharmaceutical industry
  • Cosmetics industry
  • The need for testing natural formulas for microbial contamination control arises from the potential risks associated with microorganisms. These risks include:

  • Food safety: Microorganisms can cause foodborne illnesses, which can lead to severe health consequences.
  • Product quality: Microorganisms can affect product texture, taste, and appearance.
  • Business and Technical Reasons

    Conducting EPA MB-17 Microbial Contamination Control in Natural Formulas testing is essential for various reasons:

  • Compliance with regulations
  • Ensuring product safety
  • Maintaining product quality
  • Protecting brand reputation
  • Consequences of Not Performing this Test

    Not performing this test can result in:

  • Product recalls
  • Loss of customer trust and confidence
  • Financial losses due to regulatory non-compliance
  • Damage to brand reputation.
  • Industries and Sectors

    This testing is required for various industries, including:

  • Food and Beverage industry
  • Pharmaceutical industry
  • Cosmetics industry
  • The final answer is: boxed1

    Need help or have a question?
    Contact us for prompt assistance and solutions.

    Latest News

    View all

    JOIN US
    Want to make a difference?

    Careers