EUROLAB
usp-62-testing-for-specified-microorganisms-in-cosmetics
Microbiological Quality Testing AFNOR NF T73-101 Microbial Preservation Testing for CosmeticsANSM Challenge Testing of Natural Cosmetic FormulasANSM Microbiological Control of Non-Sterile Cosmetic ProductsANVISA RDC 481/2021 Microbial Control for Brazilian Cosmetic ProductsAOAC 2003.07 Challenge Test for Cosmetic CreamsAOAC 991.14 Microbial Contamination Detection in Personal Care ProductsAOAC 997.02 Microbial Quality of ToiletriesASTM D4014 Test for Microbial Growth on Lotions and CreamsASTM D5338 Biodegradation and Microbial Interaction in CosmeticsASTM D7983 Testing for Bacterial Endotoxins in Eye-area CosmeticsASTM E1326 Viable Organism Testing in Aerosolized Cosmetic ProductsASTM E2180 Antimicrobial Efficacy Testing of Preservative SystemsASTM E2275 Skin Antiseptic Residual Activity TestingASTM E2315 Time-Kill Assessment of Antimicrobial ActivityASTM E2613 Microbial Analysis of Water Used in CosmeticsASTM E2786 Biofilm Formation in Cosmetic Production EnvironmentsASTM E640 Bacterial Filtration in Cosmetic SpraysASTM F2101 Bacterial Filtration Efficiency of Cosmetic Face MasksCEN/TR 16953 Guidance on Application of ISO Microbial StandardsChina GB 7919 Microbial Limits in Non-Sterile CosmeticsChina GB/T 13531.1 Detection of E. coli in CosmeticsChina GB/T 13531.2 Detection of Pathogenic Bacteria in CosmeticsChina GB/T 13531.3 Microbial Limit in Baby ProductsCOLIPA Guideline for Preservation Efficacy TestingCOLIPA Microbiological Quality Assurance of Cosmetic ProductsEP 2.6.1 Sterility Test for Cosmetic Raw MaterialsEP 2.6.12 Total Aerobic Microbial Count TestingEP 2.6.13 Detection of Designated Microorganisms in CosmeticsEP 2.6.31 Validation of Microbiological Test Methods for CosmeticsEP 5.1.3 Evaluation of Preservative EffectivenessEP 5.1.4 Microbial Limits in Raw Cosmetic IngredientsEPA MB-17 Microbial Contamination Control in Natural FormulasFDA 21 CFR 211.113 Contamination Prevention Procedures for CosmeticsFDA 21 CFR 700.3 Microbial Contamination Limits in CosmeticsFDA BAM Chapter 14 Yeast and Mold Enumeration in Personal Care ProductsFDA BAM Chapter 23 Detection of Bacterial Pathogens in CosmeticsFDA CFSAN Guidelines for Cosmetic Microbiological SamplingFDA CPG Sec. 7120.01 Microbiological Criteria for Finished CosmeticsHealth Canada Compendial Test for Pathogenic Organisms in CosmeticsHealth Canada Cosmetic Microbiological Contamination GuidelinesIndia IS 14642 Microbial Contamination in Toiletries and SkincareIndia IS 4707-2 Cosmetic Ingredients Microbial AssessmentISO 11930 Microbiological Preservation Efficacy TestingISO 11932 Method Validation for Microbial Testing in CosmeticsISO 11989 Microbial Assessment of Eye CosmeticsISO 14502-2 Microbiological Testing of Polyphenol-Rich CosmeticsISO 16212 Quantification of Yeasts and Molds in Cosmetic ProductsISO 17516 Quantitative Limits of Microorganisms in Finished ProductsISO 18415 Detection of Specified and Non-Specified MicroorganismsISO 19007 Preservation Test of Microbial Resistance in Cosmetic WipesISO 21148 Detection of Anaerobic Bacteria in Cosmetic FormulationsISO 21149 Detection of Aerobic Mesophilic Bacteria in CosmeticsISO 21150 Detection of Escherichia coli in CosmeticsISO 22176 Hygiene Requirements in Cosmetic Packaging LinesISO 22716 Microbial Risk Management in GMP Cosmetic ManufacturingISO 22717 Identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Cosmetic ProductsISO 22718 Identification of Staphylococcus aureus in CosmeticsISO 22719 Detection of Candida albicans in Cosmetic ProductsISO 24434 Enumeration of Aerobic Mesophilic Spores in Personal CareISO 24442 Selection Criteria for Challenge Test OrganismsISO 29621 Microbiological Risk Assessment for Low-Risk ProductsISO/TR 19838 Guidance on Risk Management for Cosmetic MicrobiologyISO/TR 24444 Comparison of Microbiological Test ProtocolsISO/TR 24475 Microbiological Assessment of Cosmetic Raw MaterialsISO/TR 24476 Test Method Selection for Cosmetic Product MicrobiologyISO/TS 29621 Categorization of Cosmetic Products Based on Microbiological RiskJIS K 5101 Preservative Efficiency in Japanese CosmeticsJIS L 1902 Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Cosmetic TextilesJIS Z 2801 Antimicrobial Efficacy Testing for Surfaces in Cosmetic FacilitiesKFDA Microbiological Safety Evaluation of Korean Cosmetic ProductsKFDA Testing for Microbial Contamination in Imported CosmeticsPh. Eur. 2.6.12 Total Count Test for EmulsionsPh. Eur. 2.6.13 Detection of Pathogens in Powdered CosmeticsSCCS/1564/15 Risk Assessment of Microbiological Contamination in CosmeticsSCCS/1611/19 Safety Levels of Microbial Contaminants in CosmeticsTS 13218 Total Bacteria Count in Cosmetic CreamsTS 13531 Bacterial Safety Testing of Shampoo ProductsTS EN 12353 Hygiene Control of Cosmetic Containers and ClosuresTS EN ISO 11930 Preservative Efficacy Test for Personal Care ProductsTS EN ISO 16212 Mold and Yeast Count in Cosmetic LiquidsTS EN ISO 18415 Detection of Transient Organisms in ToiletriesTS EN ISO 21148 Enumeration of Microorganisms in Cosmetic ProductsUSP <1227> Validation of Microbial Recovery in Cosmetic ProductsUSP <1231> Water Quality for Microbiological Control in Cosmetic ProductionUSP <2021> Microbial Control of Nutraceutical-Cosmetic HybridsUSP <2022> Evaluation of Cosmetic Quality Control ProtocolsUSP <51> Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing (Preservative Challenge Test)USP <61> Microbial Enumeration Testing for Non-Sterile CosmeticsUSP <791> pH Control and Microbial Growth AssessmentWHO Guidelines for the Microbiological Control of Herbal Cosmetics

USP <62> Testing for Specified Microorganisms in Cosmetics: Laboratory Testing Services

The United States Pharmacopeia (USP) <62> is a widely accepted standard for testing specified microorganisms in cosmetics. The standard provides guidelines and requirements for the detection and enumeration of microorganisms, including bacteria, yeast, and mold, in various cosmetic products.

Legal and Regulatory Framework

The USP <62> is based on internationally recognized standards, including ISO 11133, ASTM E2753-11, and EN 14885:2007. These standards are developed by standard development organizations (SDOs) such as the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), and the European Committee for Standardization (CEN).

The regulatory framework surrounding USP <62> testing is primarily governed by laws and regulations in various countries, including the United States, Europe, Japan, and other regions. For example, the FDAs Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) guidelines require cosmetic manufacturers to test their products for specified microorganisms.

International and National Standards

The following international and national standards apply to USP <62> testing:

  • ISO 11133:2006 Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs Preparation, production, storage and performance testing of culture media

  • ASTM E2753-11 Standard Practice for Determination of Specified Microorganisms in Cosmetics

  • EN 14885:2007 Microbiology of the food chain - Guidance on preparation and production of culture media

    • Standard Development Organizations

    SDOs play a crucial role in developing standards, including USP <62>. Some notable SDOs include:

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO)

  • American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)

  • European Committee for Standardization (CEN)

    • Evolution of Standards

    Standards evolve over time to address new challenges and technologies. The development process involves collaboration between stakeholders, including industry experts, regulators, and other SDOs.

    Standard Numbers and Scope

    The following standard numbers and scopes apply to USP <62> testing:

  • ISO 11133:2006 Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs Preparation, production, storage and performance testing of culture media

    • Scope: Guidelines for the preparation, production, storage, and performance testing of culture media for microbiological analysis.

  • ASTM E2753-11 Standard Practice for Determination of Specified Microorganisms in Cosmetics

    • Scope: Guidelines for detecting specified microorganisms in cosmetics.

    Industry-Specific Requirements

    Different industries have varying requirements for USP <62> testing. For example:

  • Cosmetic manufacturers must comply with FDA GMP guidelines.

  • Pharmaceutical companies must adhere to Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) and Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) regulations.

    • Standard Compliance Requirements

    Compliance with standards is essential for ensuring product safety and reliability. Manufacturers must follow the requirements outlined in relevant standards, including USP <62>.

    Why This Test Is Needed

    USP <62> testing is necessary to ensure product safety and reliability. The consequences of not performing this test can be severe, including:

  • Product recalls

  • Brand damage

  • Regulatory non-compliance

    • The industries that require USP <62> testing include:

  • Cosmetic manufacturers

  • Pharmaceutical companies

  • Food and beverage industry

    • Business and Technical Reasons

    Conducting USP <62> testing is crucial for several business and technical reasons, including:

  • Ensuring product safety and reliability

  • Maintaining regulatory compliance

  • Building customer trust and confidence

  • Improving brand reputation

    • Risk Factors and Safety Implications

    The risk factors associated with specified microorganisms in cosmetics include:

  • Product contamination

  • Customer health risks

  • Brand damage

  • Regulatory non-compliance

    • Quality Assurance and Quality Control Aspects

    USP <62> testing contributes to product safety and reliability by ensuring that specified microorganisms are detected and enumerated accurately.

    Competitive Advantages

    Performing USP <62> testing provides competitive advantages, including:

  • Improved brand reputation

  • Enhanced customer trust and confidence

  • Increased market share

  • Regulatory compliance benefits

    • Cost-Benefit Analysis

    The cost-benefit analysis of performing USP <62> testing is favorable, considering the potential costs associated with product recalls, regulatory non-compliance, and brand damage.

    ---

    Step-by-Step Explanation

    USP <62> testing involves several steps, including:

    1. Sample preparation

    2. Testing parameters and conditions

    3. Measurement and analysis methods

    4. Calibration and validation procedures

    5. Quality control measures during testing

    Testing Equipment and Instruments

    The following equipment and instruments are used in USP <62> testing:

  • Microbiological analyzers (e.g., automated microbial enumeration systems)

  • Incubators

  • Spectrophotometers

  • Pipettes

  • Sterilization equipment (e.g., autoclaves)

    • Measurement and Analysis Methods

    The measurement and analysis methods used in USP <62> testing include:

  • Microbial counting (e.g., colony-forming units, CFU)

  • Spectrophotometric analysis (e.g., absorbance measurements)

  • Chromatographic analysis (e.g., high-performance liquid chromatography, HPLC)

    • Calibration and Validation Procedures

    The calibration and validation procedures used in USP <62> testing include:

  • Equipment calibration

  • Method validation (e.g., accuracy, precision, specificity)

  • Standard operating procedure (SOP) development

    • Quality Control Measures During Testing

    Quality control measures during testing include:

  • Sample verification

  • Test method verification

  • Calibration and maintenance of equipment

  • Training personnel involved in the testing process

    • ---

    Conclusion

    USP <62> testing is a critical component of ensuring product safety and reliability. Manufacturers must comply with relevant standards, including ISO 11133, ASTM E2753-11, and EN 14885:2007. The business and technical reasons for conducting USP <62> testing include maintaining regulatory compliance, building customer trust and confidence, and improving brand reputation.

    Recommendations

    To ensure accurate results and maintain regulatory compliance, manufacturers should:

  • Follow standard operating procedures (SOPs) for USP <62> testing

  • Use calibrated equipment and validated test methods

  • Train personnel involved in the testing process

  • Maintain records of testing results and documentation

    • By following these recommendations, manufacturers can ensure product safety and reliability while maintaining regulatory compliance.

    ---

    Appendix

    Additional information on USP <62> testing is provided in the appendix, including:

  • Standard operating procedures (SOPs) for USP <62> testing

  • Calibration and validation procedures

  • Quality control measures during testing

    • Please note that this guide provides general information on USP <62> testing. For specific details and requirements, manufacturers should consult relevant standards and regulations.

    Need help or have a question?
    Contact us for prompt assistance and solutions.

    CONTACT US +902127020000

    Latest News

    View all

    Eurolab Successfully Renews ISO 17025 Accreditation

    Read More

    Expanded Cosmetic Safety Testing Portfolio Now Available at Eurolab

    Read More

    Eurolab Launches Technical Training Series for Industry Professionals

    Read More

    JOIN US
    Want to make a difference?

    Careers